Self-Hosted Index

Compare

Shaarli vs Wallabag

Both Shaarli and Wallabag are self-hosted alternatives to Pocket and Raindrop.io.

Side by side

FieldShaarliWallabag
DescriptionPersonal, minimalist, super-fast, no-database bookmarking and link sharing platform.Web application, formerly Poche, allowing you to save articles to read them later with improved readability.
GitHub stars3,91713,038
LicenseZlibMIT
PlatformsPHP, debPHP
Latest releasev0.16.10, 21 October 20262.6.15, 28 October 2026
Repository activity29 October 202630 October 2026
HealthActiveActive
CategoriesBookmarks and Link SharingArchiving and Digital Preservation (DP)
Websitehttps://github.com/shaarli/Shaarlihttps://www.wallabag.org
Source codehttps://github.com/shaarli/Shaarlihttps://github.com/wallabag/wallabag

Where the records differ

Computed from the two records above: a line appears only where the dataset states a figure, a date or a set relation, and no line recommends one application over the other.

  • Wallabag has more GitHub stars in the dataset, 13,038 against 3,917.
  • Wallabag recorded repository activity more recently, 30 October 2026 against 29 October 2026.
  • Wallabag has the newer release on record: 2.6.15, 28 October 2026, against v0.16.10, 21 October 2026.
  • Licenses differ: Shaarli is listed under Zlib; Wallabag under MIT.
  • Platforms differ: Shaarli lists PHP, deb; Wallabag lists PHP.
  • Shaarli is filed under Bookmarks and Link Sharing; Wallabag is filed under Archiving and Digital Preservation (DP).