Self-Hosted Index

Compare

ryot vs Watcharr

Both ryot and Watcharr are self-hosted alternatives to Letterboxd and Trakt.

Side by side

FieldryotWatcharr
DescriptionTrack various facets of your life - media, fitness, etc.Add and track all the shows and movies you are watching. Comes with user authentication, modern and clean UI and a very simple setup.
GitHub stars3,6501,573
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
PlatformsDockerDocker
Latest releasev10.5.0, 22 August 2026v4.4.0-beta.1, 31 October 2026
Repository activity1 November 202631 October 2026
HealthActiveActive
CategoriesPersonal DashboardsMedia Management
Websitehttps://github.com/ignisda/ryothttps://github.com/sbondCo/Watcharr
Source codehttps://github.com/ignisda/ryothttps://github.com/sbondCo/Watcharr

Where the records differ

Computed from the two records above: a line appears only where the dataset states a figure, a date or a set relation, and no line recommends one application over the other.

  • ryot has more GitHub stars in the dataset, 3,650 against 1,573.
  • ryot recorded repository activity more recently, 1 November 2026 against 31 October 2026.
  • Watcharr has the newer release on record: v4.4.0-beta.1, 31 October 2026, against v10.5.0, 22 August 2026.
  • Licenses differ: ryot is listed under GPL-3.0; Watcharr under MIT.
  • Both list the same platforms: Docker.
  • ryot is filed under Personal Dashboards; Watcharr is filed under Media Management.