Self-Hosted Index

Compare

Readeck vs Shaarli

Both Readeck and Shaarli are self-hosted alternatives to Pocket. Both are filed under Bookmarks and Link Sharing.

Side by side

FieldReadeckShaarli
DescriptionSave the precious readable content of web pages you like and want to keep forever. See it as a bookmark manager and a read later tool.Personal, minimalist, super-fast, no-database bookmarking and link sharing platform.
GitHub starsNot tracked — proprietary, no public repository3,917
LicenseAGPL-3.0Zlib
PlatformsGo, DockerPHP, deb
Latest releaseNo stable releasev0.16.10, 21 October 2026
Repository activityNot tracked — proprietary, no public repository29 October 2026
HealthNo activity date recordedActive
CategoriesBookmarks and Link Sharing, Archiving and Digital Preservation (DP)Bookmarks and Link Sharing
Websitehttps://readeck.org/en/https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli
Source codehttps://codeberg.org/readeck/readeckhttps://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli

Where the records differ

Computed from the two records above: a line appears only where the dataset states a figure, a date or a set relation, and no line recommends one application over the other.

  • Health labels differ: Readeck is filed as No activity date recorded, Shaarli as Active.
  • Licenses differ: Readeck is listed under AGPL-3.0; Shaarli under Zlib.
  • Platforms differ: Readeck lists Go, Docker; Shaarli lists PHP, deb.
  • Readeck is also filed under Archiving and Digital Preservation (DP).

Missing an app? Add it to awesome-selfhosted