Self-Hosted Index

Compare

Puter vs Seafile

Both Puter and Seafile are self-hosted alternatives to Dropbox, Google Drive, MEGA and OneDrive. Both are filed under File Transfer & Synchronization.

Side by side

FieldPuterSeafile
DescriptionWeb-based operating system designed to be feature-rich, exceptionally fast, and highly extensible.File hosting and sharing solution primary for teams and organizations.
GitHub stars44,05215,407
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-2.0, GPL-3.0, AGPL-3.0, Apache-2.0
PlatformsNodejs, DockerC
Latest release26.10.1, 25 October 2026v9.0.5, 27 February 2024
Repository activity31 October 202616 October 2026
HealthActiveActive
CategoriesFile Transfer & Synchronization, Remote AccessFile Transfer & Synchronization, Groupware
Websitehttps://puter.com/https://www.seafile.com/en/home/
Source codehttps://github.com/heyputer/puterhttps://github.com/haiwen/seafile

Where the records differ

Computed from the two records above: a line appears only where the dataset states a figure, a date or a set relation, and no line recommends one application over the other.

  • Puter has more GitHub stars in the dataset, 44,052 against 15,407.
  • Puter recorded repository activity more recently, 31 October 2026 against 16 October 2026.
  • Puter has the newer release on record: 26.10.1, 25 October 2026, against v9.0.5, 27 February 2024.
  • Licenses differ: Puter is listed under AGPL-3.0; Seafile under GPL-2.0, GPL-3.0, AGPL-3.0, Apache-2.0.
  • Platforms differ: Puter lists Nodejs, Docker; Seafile lists C.
  • Puter is also filed under Remote Access; Seafile is also filed under Groupware.