Self-Hosted Index

Compare

ProjectSend vs Zipline

Both ProjectSend and Zipline are self-hosted alternatives to MediaFire and WeTransfer. Both are filed under File Transfer - Single-click & Drag-n-drop Upload.

Side by side

FieldProjectSendZipline
DescriptionUpload files and assign them to specific clients you create. Give access to those files to your clients.Lightweight, fast and reliable file sharing server that is commonly used with ShareX, offering a react-based Web UI and fast API.
GitHub stars2,0393,482
LicenseGPL-2.0MIT
PlatformsPHPDocker, Nodejs
Latest releasev2.8.0, 29 October 2026v4.8.2, 25 October 2026
Repository activity29 October 202627 October 2026
HealthActiveActive
CategoriesFile Transfer - Single-click & Drag-n-drop UploadFile Transfer - Single-click & Drag-n-drop Upload
Websitehttps://www.projectsend.org/https://github.com/diced/zipline
Source codehttps://github.com/projectsend/projectsendhttps://github.com/diced/zipline

Where the records differ

Computed from the two records above: a line appears only where the dataset states a figure, a date or a set relation, and no line recommends one application over the other.

  • Zipline has more GitHub stars in the dataset, 3,482 against 2,039.
  • ProjectSend recorded repository activity more recently, 29 October 2026 against 27 October 2026.
  • ProjectSend has the newer release on record: v2.8.0, 29 October 2026, against v4.8.2, 25 October 2026.
  • Licenses differ: ProjectSend is listed under GPL-2.0; Zipline under MIT.
  • Platforms differ: ProjectSend lists PHP; Zipline lists Docker, Nodejs.
  • Both are filed under the same categories: File Transfer - Single-click & Drag-n-drop Upload.