Self-Hosted Index

Compare

Jellyfin vs MediaCMS

Both Jellyfin and MediaCMS are self-hosted alternatives to Vimeo.

Side by side

FieldJellyfinMediaCMS
DescriptionMedia server for audio, video, books, comics, and photos with a sleek interface and robust transcoding capabilities. Almost all modern platforms have clients, including Roku, Android TV, iOS, and Kodi.Modern, fully featured video and media CMS, written in Python/Django/React, featuring a REST API.
GitHub stars58,9065,177
LicenseGPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
PlatformsC#, deb, DockerPython, Docker
Latest releasev12.4, 26 October 2026v9.4.0, 26 October 2026
Repository activity1 November 202626 October 2026
HealthActiveActive
CategoriesMedia Streaming - Multimedia StreamingMedia Streaming - Video Streaming, Content Management Systems (CMS)
Websitehttps://jellyfin.orghttps://mediacms.io
Source codehttps://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfinhttps://github.com/mediacms-io/mediacms

Where the records differ

Computed from the two records above: a line appears only where the dataset states a figure, a date or a set relation, and no line recommends one application over the other.

  • Jellyfin has more GitHub stars in the dataset, 58,906 against 5,177.
  • Jellyfin recorded repository activity more recently, 1 November 2026 against 26 October 2026.
  • Latest releases on record: Jellyfin v12.4, MediaCMS v9.4.0.
  • Licenses differ: Jellyfin is listed under GPL-2.0; MediaCMS under AGPL-3.0.
  • Platforms differ: Jellyfin lists C#, deb, Docker; MediaCMS lists Python, Docker.
  • Jellyfin is filed under Media Streaming - Multimedia Streaming; MediaCMS is filed under Content Management Systems (CMS), Media Streaming - Video Streaming.