Self-Hosted Index

Compare

copyparty vs Syncthing

Both copyparty and Syncthing are self-hosted alternatives to Dropbox.

Side by side

FieldcopypartySyncthing
DescriptionPortable file server with accelerated resumable uploads, deduplication, WebDAV, FTP, zeroconf, media indexer, video thumbnails, audio transcoding, and write-only folders, in a single file with no mandatory dependencies.Peer-to-peer file synchronisation tool.
GitHub stars47,22789,995
LicenseMITMPL-2.0
PlatformsPythonGo, Docker, deb
Latest releasev1.20.26, 14 October 2026v2.1.7, 21 October 2026
Repository activity21 October 202627 October 2026
HealthActiveActive
CategoriesFile Transfer - Web-based File ManagersFile Transfer & Synchronization
Websitehttps://github.com/9001/copypartyhttps://syncthing.net/
Source codehttps://github.com/9001/copypartyhttps://github.com/syncthing/syncthing

Where the records differ

Computed from the two records above: a line appears only where the dataset states a figure, a date or a set relation, and no line recommends one application over the other.

  • Syncthing has more GitHub stars in the dataset, 89,995 against 47,227.
  • Syncthing recorded repository activity more recently, 27 October 2026 against 21 October 2026.
  • Syncthing has the newer release on record: v2.1.7, 21 October 2026, against v1.20.26, 14 October 2026.
  • Licenses differ: copyparty is listed under MIT; Syncthing under MPL-2.0.
  • Platforms differ: copyparty lists Python; Syncthing lists Go, Docker, deb.
  • copyparty is filed under File Transfer - Web-based File Managers; Syncthing is filed under File Transfer & Synchronization.