Self-Hosted Index

Compare

copyparty vs Seafile

Both copyparty and Seafile are self-hosted alternatives to Dropbox and Google Drive.

Side by side

FieldcopypartySeafile
DescriptionPortable file server with accelerated resumable uploads, deduplication, WebDAV, FTP, zeroconf, media indexer, video thumbnails, audio transcoding, and write-only folders, in a single file with no mandatory dependencies.File hosting and sharing solution primary for teams and organizations.
GitHub stars47,22715,407
LicenseMITGPL-2.0, GPL-3.0, AGPL-3.0, Apache-2.0
PlatformsPythonC
Latest releasev1.20.26, 14 October 2026v9.0.5, 27 February 2024
Repository activity21 October 202616 October 2026
HealthActiveActive
CategoriesFile Transfer - Web-based File ManagersFile Transfer & Synchronization, Groupware
Websitehttps://github.com/9001/copypartyhttps://www.seafile.com/en/home/
Source codehttps://github.com/9001/copypartyhttps://github.com/haiwen/seafile

Where the records differ

Computed from the two records above: a line appears only where the dataset states a figure, a date or a set relation, and no line recommends one application over the other.

  • copyparty has more GitHub stars in the dataset, 47,227 against 15,407.
  • copyparty recorded repository activity more recently, 21 October 2026 against 16 October 2026.
  • copyparty has the newer release on record: v1.20.26, 14 October 2026, against v9.0.5, 27 February 2024.
  • Licenses differ: copyparty is listed under MIT; Seafile under GPL-2.0, GPL-3.0, AGPL-3.0, Apache-2.0.
  • Platforms differ: copyparty lists Python; Seafile lists C.
  • copyparty is filed under File Transfer - Web-based File Managers; Seafile is filed under File Transfer & Synchronization, Groupware.