Self-Hosted Index

Compare

Appwrite vs NocoDB

Both Appwrite and NocoDB are self-hosted alternatives to Firebase and Supabase Cloud.

Side by side

FieldAppwriteNocoDB
DescriptionEnd to end backend server for web, native, and mobile developers 🚀.No-code platform that turns any database into a smart spreadsheet.
GitHub stars57,84165,399
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseSUL-1.0
PlatformsDockerNodejs, Docker
Latest release2.6.2, 24 October 20262026.10.1, 29 October 2026
Repository activity1 November 202631 October 2026
HealthActiveActive
CategoriesSoftware Development - Low CodeDatabase Management
Websitehttps://appwrite.iohttps://www.nocodb.com/
Source codehttps://github.com/appwrite/appwritehttps://github.com/nocodb/nocodb

Where the records differ

Computed from the two records above: a line appears only where the dataset states a figure, a date or a set relation, and no line recommends one application over the other.

  • NocoDB has more GitHub stars in the dataset, 65,399 against 57,841.
  • Appwrite recorded repository activity more recently, 1 November 2026 against 31 October 2026.
  • NocoDB has the newer release on record: 2026.10.1, 29 October 2026, against 2.6.2, 24 October 2026.
  • Licenses differ: Appwrite is listed under BSD-3-Clause; NocoDB under SUL-1.0.
  • Platforms differ: Appwrite lists Docker; NocoDB lists Nodejs, Docker.
  • Appwrite is filed under Software Development - Low Code; NocoDB is filed under Database Management.